Theranos: O’ How The Mighty Have Fallen

It seems like a perfect plot for a drama fuelled movie: a young, pretty and audaciously smart woman drops out of university to “revolutionise” an existing industry with the encouragement of her old supervisor (punch line “be the change you want to see”). The upstart wannabe then starts to dress in black turtlenecks –in emulation of her hero – and spout rhetoric of “revolutionising blood testing” with her wondrous Edison machine. But here’s the catch: Edison is still a prototype and does not seem to work (queue ominous music with minority extra solemnly declaring that “all the tests are wrong”). The FDA then catches on, shuts down one of the two clinics, and the older, but still pretty, woman contemplates the inevitable crash of her company. Coming soon, starring Jennifer Lawrence as the founder of Theranos, Elizabeth Holmes.


https://thiscomplexlife.wordpress.com/2016/08/21/theranos-o-how-the-mighty-have-fallen/


https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/elisabeth-bik-la-deceleuse-de-fraudes-scientifiques-soupcons


https://francesoir.fr/opinions-tribunes/elisabeth-bik-consultante-en-integrite-scientifique-joue-un-role-essentiel-dans


https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339631024_Comment_moderation_and_freedom_of_speech_at_PubPeer_challenges_and_issues#pf4



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interview of Elisabeth Bik – Scientific Editorial Director at uBiome

Image
"uBiome is the leader in microbial genomics. We develop microbiome products for both consumers as well as for patients and clinicians.  We have developed two clinical products, SmartGut for gastrointestinal conditions, and SmartJane, which combines vaginal microbiome analysis with STI and HPV genotyping. These clinical products are clinician-prescribed and are reimbursable by most health insurance companies." Elisabeth Bik
Read more

The troll Leonid Schneider & ‘For Better Science’: crank or cure?

Image
I’ve been aware of Leonid Schneider’s expose blog ever since the piece on the supposed  fraud of Nobel prize-winner Gregg Semenza  appeared on my Twitter feed. Schneider portrays himself as an  under-dog ; the self-styled “ failed scientist ” has taken a liking to pillaring the hypocrisies of the scientific establishment. To be honest, although criticisms of the undertakings of science are always needed, especially when it concerns matters of data integrity, publishing practices, and perverse incentives in academia, I am a bit weary of uncritically listening to someone who appears to have no established career in either science or science journalism (the only pieces published under his own name appear only on the blog he runs). And his pieces do come off with a bit of crankiness.
Read more