Predicting research results can mean better science and better advice

Expert predictions can be used as a tool for making research stronger, as my co-authors Stefano DellaVigna, Devin Pope and I argue in a new article published in Science. 

The way we interpret research results depends on what we already believe. For example, if we saw a study claiming to show that smoking was healthy, we would probably be pretty sceptical.

If a result surprises experts, that fact itself is informative. It could suggest that something may have been wrong with the study design.

Or, if the study was well-designed and the finding replicated, we might think that result fundamentally changed our understanding of how the world works.


https://theconversation.com/predicting-research-results-can-mean-better-science-and-better-advice-125568



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Defamation lawsuits against Leonid Schneider (author of the "For Better Science" blog)

Comment moderation and freedom of speech at the social media site, PubPeer: challenges and issues