The Best Science is Inclusive of African Americans

According to the 2020 Census, 46.9 million people are African Americans/Black. There is a need to ensure that biomedical research reflects the prevalence of disease in African Americans relative to the population demographics. This will require reflective forethought that is visible throughout the research proposal from the conceptual framework to recruitment and retention plans that include sample size calculations that account for over sampling to ensure enough African Americans are in the sample for meaningful analysis. It is important for the scientific community to understand African Americans are not a monolithic people, and there is a need for population specific studies. Even the way we apply and define “the best science” needs to change. If African Americans are not included in the proposed science when there is clear technical merit, be it instrumentation and pharmaceutical development or intervention implementation, the question that has to be asked is, is this the best science that is being proposed? 


More at:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11524-021-00576-5





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interview of Elisabeth Bik – Scientific Editorial Director at uBiome

Image
"uBiome is the leader in microbial genomics. We develop microbiome products for both consumers as well as for patients and clinicians.  We have developed two clinical products, SmartGut for gastrointestinal conditions, and SmartJane, which combines vaginal microbiome analysis with STI and HPV genotyping. These clinical products are clinician-prescribed and are reimbursable by most health insurance companies." Elisabeth Bik
Read more

The troll Leonid Schneider & ‘For Better Science’: crank or cure?

Image
I’ve been aware of Leonid Schneider’s expose blog ever since the piece on the supposed  fraud of Nobel prize-winner Gregg Semenza  appeared on my Twitter feed. Schneider portrays himself as an  under-dog ; the self-styled “ failed scientist ” has taken a liking to pillaring the hypocrisies of the scientific establishment. To be honest, although criticisms of the undertakings of science are always needed, especially when it concerns matters of data integrity, publishing practices, and perverse incentives in academia, I am a bit weary of uncritically listening to someone who appears to have no established career in either science or science journalism (the only pieces published under his own name appear only on the blog he runs). And his pieces do come off with a bit of crankiness.
Read more